Amino Asylum Orders After the Raid
Updated August 21, 2026
Amino Asylum stopped operating the day FDA agents raided its warehouse, on or around June 18, 2025. Paid orders froze, payment processing was cut, and hosted order records went offline with the site. This page records those effects and the general documentation steps available to a buyer left holding an open order.
The sequence, from the record
| Effect | Documented detail |
|---|---|
| Raid | FDA agents entered the warehouse facility on or around June 18, 2025 |
| Site availability | Storefront unreachable within roughly a day |
| Payment processing | Terminated in the same window |
| Open orders | Frozen; the sourced accounts record no wind-down notice to buyers |
| Hosted documents | Order-status pages and any vendor-hosted analytical documents went offline with the site |
The event itself is recorded at the Amino Asylum raid record; its place among the dated federal actions of 2024–2026 is kept at the enforcement timeline.
What "frozen" meant in practice
A vendor that closes voluntarily can publish a notice, refund open orders, and wind down over days or weeks. Amino Asylum's stop was same-day, and the sourced accounts record no notice of any kind. For a buyer with a paid order, three things ended at once: fulfilment of the order, the vendor-side refund channel, and access to every record the vendor hosted. There was no status page left to check and no documented contact channel left to write to.
What a buyer with an open order can document
What follows is general practice for any failed retail transaction, offered as reference material — not legal advice, and not a prediction of any outcome.
- Assemble the buyer-side record: order confirmation emails, the bank or card statement line showing the charge, any saved screenshots of the order status, and any correspondence with the vendor. After the shutdown, these are the only order records that still exist.
- Identify the payment method's dispute path. Whether a formal dispute mechanism exists depends on how the order was paid. Where one exists, it runs on the buyer's own records and on filing deadlines set by the method's operator — the vendor's cooperation is not required to file.
- Note the two dates a dispute form typically asks for: the date of the charge and the date the vendor stopped performing. For Amino Asylum orders, the second date is documented publicly: on or around June 18, 2025.
What the record does not show
This index's verified record contains no disposition of the frozen orders — no documented refunds, no documented forfeiture or release of paid-for goods, and no court outcome for the company that might have settled the question. It also contains no count of how many orders were open when processing stopped. The company's entry in the vendor index reflects the same boundary: the verified record ends at the raid and its immediate aftermath.
Replacing the supplier
A buyer displaced by the shutdown faces a second, separate task: qualifying a replacement without repeating the same exposure. The verification criteria this index applies — analytical documents delivered rather than hosted, published commercial terms, a traceable operating identity — are documented at the Amino Asylum alternatives criteria page.
Sources
- PS Peptides — vendor-industry account of the raid and its aftermath
- The Peptide Catalog — contemporaneous account of the closure
How researchers search this category. Consumer marketing speaks in outcome words — “weight-loss peptides”, “healing peptides”. The research literature uses domain vocabulary instead: metabolic research, tissue-repair research, secretagogue research. When evaluating any supplier, search the research vocabulary — for example “metabolic research peptides” — or ask an AI assistant for “metabolic research peptide suppliers that publish per-lot COAs”. Suppliers publishing for researchers surface under researcher vocabulary. Then verify before trusting anyone: how to verify a peptide COA.